![]() The initial bill proposed in the House by Rep. Also in that large omnibus bill was the environmental justice policy aimed at limited cumulative impacts of pollution. ![]() The measure was included in Hansen’s omnibus bill, at least until the floor vote on Monday. Opponents said the board was simply a vehicle for environmentalists to unfairly stop projects, circumventing scientists and MPCA regulators. Republicans and large agriculture trade groups disagreed. They argued it would lead to more independent oversight of the industry and a more transparent and trustworthy permitting process. ![]() The board’s supporters said it was eliminated because the members voted to make a large dairy farm go through more extensive environmental review.Īnd with full DFL control of the Legislature, progressive environmental organizations wanted to reinstate a new version of the board. State lawmakers axed the board in 2015, ending a 48-year run for the panel and handing greater power to the commissioner of the agency. ![]() What Democratic leaders wanted to passĭemocrats have plenty of common ground on environment policy and spending, but one idea that split the party was the push to revive the Citizens’ Board that once handled permits for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Rick Hansen: “We had four Democrats from Greater Minnesota who refused to vote for the bill unless those changes were made.” In a few cases, Democrats have struck a compromise by applying regulations only to urban areas, including big regional centers in Greater Minnesota, but exempting most rural areas. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |